I’ve come across so many people recently who complain about the adoption laws here in the
Only 28 states ( Arizona, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana,Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia ) have a waiting period before the mother is allowed to sign consent forms.
Of those 28 states, only 20 ( Arizona, District of Columbia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania,Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia )have a waiting period of 72 hours or longer after birth for the first mother.
A mere 15 states (Alabama, Alaska, District of Columbia, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Minnesota, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington) have some kind of revocation period.
Two states (
A disturbing 15 states (
To top it off, 26 states (Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Wyoming) have putative father registries which allow for easy termination of father’s rights without his consent or even his knowledge.
Why are a lot of legislators refusing to put in place more laws? They say it will deter a lot of people from adopting, which they don’t want. I find this strange. I would think that adoptive parents would want to make sure the child they got was freely and voluntarily given to them. I also think putting in place more protection would definitely decrease the incidence of long, drawn out custody battles. I think that’s about the closest thing anyone is going to get to a win-win-win situation in adoption.
0 comments:
Post a Comment